Accepting Prophecy: Paul’s Response to Agabus with Insights from Valerius Maximus and Josephus
This article highlights seemingly conflicting presentations of the Spirit’s guidance of Paul’s journeys in Acts 16.6-10 and 21.1-14, noting in particular the difficulties posed by the disciples’ instruction ‘through the Spirit’ not to go to Jerusalem in 21.4b. In contrast to past treatments, I sugge...
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
[2016]
|
In: |
Journal for the study of the New Testament
Jahr: 2016, Band: 39, Heft: 2, Seiten: 188-208 |
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Bibel. Apostelgeschichte 16,6-10
/ Bibel. Apostelgeschichte 21,1-14
/ Valerius, Maximus, Facta et dicta memorabilia
/ Josephus, Flavius 37-100, De bello Judaico
/ Prophetie
/ Determinismus
/ Willensfreiheit
|
IxTheo Notationen: | BE Griechisch-Römische Religionen HC Neues Testament HD Frühjudentum NBE Anthropologie |
weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Determinism
B Acts 21.1-14 B Josephus Jewish War B Valerius Maximus B Prophecy B Acts 16.6-10 |
Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Zusammenfassung: | This article highlights seemingly conflicting presentations of the Spirit’s guidance of Paul’s journeys in Acts 16.6-10 and 21.1-14, noting in particular the difficulties posed by the disciples’ instruction ‘through the Spirit’ not to go to Jerusalem in 21.4b. In contrast to past treatments, I suggest that it is possible to hold together Luke’s portrayal of 21.4b as an inspired instruction and as a positive reading of Paul’s journey to Jerusalem. The study is informed by comparisons to the treatment of the traditional themes of determinism and human freedom in two other first-century texts: Valerius Maximus’s Memorable Doings and Sayings and Josephus’s Jewish War. Although very different texts from each other, Valerius’s popular register and Josephus’s Jewish Hellenistic setting enable each to illuminate aspects of Luke’s presentation. I conclude that the tensions in the Lukan Paul’s discernment of his journey to Jerusalem stem not only from Luke’s focus on a divine plan, but his particular interest in underscoring the importance of human response, with significant implications for the way the plan unfolds across Acts. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1745-5294 |
Enthält: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the New Testament
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0142064X16675265 |