The Use of Violent Biblical Texts by the Lord’s Resistance Army in Northern Uganda
This article examines the ideologies employed to justify violence by the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) in northern Uganda, while basing themselves on biblical texts from the Old Testament. The article observes that the LRA have used the Bible to justify their violent actions which have left the socia...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Pubblicazione: |
[2017]
|
| In: |
Transformation
Anno: 2017, Volume: 34, Fascicolo: 2, Pagine: 91-100 |
| Notazioni IxTheo: | CH Cristianesimo e società HB Antico Testamento KAJ Età contemporanea KBN Africa subsahariana NBE Antropologia |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (Publisher) Volltext (doi) |
| Riepilogo: | This article examines the ideologies employed to justify violence by the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) in northern Uganda, while basing themselves on biblical texts from the Old Testament. The article observes that the LRA have used the Bible to justify their violent actions which have left the social structures in Acholi-land broken down. It engages in two major questions: 1. How does the LRA interpret particular Old Testament texts? And, 2. Is there anything in the Old Testament texts that facilitates the LRA’s interpretations and applications? Having conducted an exegetical analysis of ‘frequently’-echoed texts, I conclude the article by observing that the LRA’s understanding and use of biblical texts do not exist in a vacuum and that the texts are open to violent interpretation, especially when they seem to sanction violent acts. I then close the article by questioning how biblical scholars and theologians can safeguard against the harmful application of biblical texts such as that employed by the LRA. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1759-8931 |
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: Transformation
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0265378816680768 |