The Letter that Lives: Mid. Ps. 29 as a Case Study of Anti-Christological Polemic
Current methodologies in the study of Midrash allow for the hypothesis that Mid. Ps. 29.1 is polemically structured as an exegetical dispute with a christological interpretation of Ps. 29 (LXX 28). Seemingly without provocation, the Midrash abandons traditional readings of the phrase 'םילא ינב...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
[2016]
|
| Dans: |
The journal of theological studies
Année: 2016, Volume: 67, Numéro: 1, Pages: 38-76 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Bibel. Psalmen 29,1
/ Midrash
/ Critique textuelle
/ Polémique
/ Christologie
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | BH Judaïsme CC Christianisme et religions non-chrétiennes; relations interreligieuses HB Ancien Testament NBF Christologie |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | Current methodologies in the study of Midrash allow for the hypothesis that Mid. Ps. 29.1 is polemically structured as an exegetical dispute with a christological interpretation of Ps. 29 (LXX 28). Seemingly without provocation, the Midrash abandons traditional readings of the phrase 'םילא ינב 'הל ובה' (‘Ascribe to the Lord, o ye sons of God’), creating a singular repositioning of Ps. 29:1 in the history of rabbinic interpretation by incorporating the Septuagint’s second and mistaken doublet, ‘sons of rams’. This specific reading coincides with Jerome’s translation of Ps. 28:1a in the Hebraica Veritas ( Adferte Domino filios arietum ), as does the martyrological significance that both the rabbinic homilist(s) and Jerome (amongst others) read into the phrase. I argue that the homilist’s foray into the sphere of disputed dogma is a response to his own historical context, undertaken with a view to defending a vision of Israel’s unmediated covenantal life expressed through martyrdom and eschatology. Here is a midrash that could reflect, if not an actual polemic on this particular phrase, at least Jewish resolve to participate in the long-drawn-out contest between two rivals for the much-coveted title ‘sons of God’, through appropriating and subverting dominant modes of cultural authority. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-4607 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: The journal of theological studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1093/jts/flv124 |