The Historicity of the Neronian Persecution: A Response to Brent Shaw
Brent Shaw has recently argued that the Neronian persecution never occurred. In fact, there are no grounds for doubting Tacitus' report of the persecution. Sources later than Tacitus (Melito, Dionysius of Alexandria) date the martyrdoms of Peter and Paul to the reign of Nero, but those reports...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
[2017]
|
| In: |
New Testament studies
Jahr: 2017, Band: 63, Heft: 1, Seiten: 146-152 |
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Nero, Römisches Reich, Kaiser 37-68
/ Christenverfolgung
/ Geschichte 64
/ Tacitus, Cornelius 55-120, Annales
/ Geschichtlichkeit
|
| IxTheo Notationen: | KAB Kirchengeschichte 30-500; Frühchristentum SA Kirchenrecht; Staatskirchenrecht |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Nero
B Nazoreans B Tacitus B Peter B Persecution B Paul |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Zusammenfassung: | Brent Shaw has recently argued that the Neronian persecution never occurred. In fact, there are no grounds for doubting Tacitus' report of the persecution. Sources later than Tacitus (Melito, Dionysius of Alexandria) date the martyrdoms of Peter and Paul to the reign of Nero, but those reports have no bearing on the veracity of Tacitus' account. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-8145 |
| Bezug: | Kritik in "Response to Christopher Jones (2018)"
|
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: New Testament studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0028688516000308 |