The Historicity of the Neronian Persecution: A Response to Brent Shaw
Brent Shaw has recently argued that the Neronian persecution never occurred. In fact, there are no grounds for doubting Tacitus' report of the persecution. Sources later than Tacitus (Melito, Dionysius of Alexandria) date the martyrdoms of Peter and Paul to the reign of Nero, but those reports...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Publicado: |
[2017]
|
En: |
New Testament studies
Año: 2017, Volumen: 63, Número: 1, Páginas: 146-152 |
(Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar: | B
Nero, Römisches Reich, Kaiser 37-68
/ Persecución de cristianos
/ Geschichte 64
/ Tacitus, Cornelius 55-120, Annales
/ Historicidad
|
Clasificaciones IxTheo: | KAB Cristianismo primitivo S Derecho eclesiástico |
Otras palabras clave: | B
Nero
B Nazoreans B Tacitus B Peter B Persecution B Paul |
Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Sumario: | Brent Shaw has recently argued that the Neronian persecution never occurred. In fact, there are no grounds for doubting Tacitus' report of the persecution. Sources later than Tacitus (Melito, Dionysius of Alexandria) date the martyrdoms of Peter and Paul to the reign of Nero, but those reports have no bearing on the veracity of Tacitus' account. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-8145 |
Reference: | Kritik in "Response to Christopher Jones (2018)"
|
Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: New Testament studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0028688516000308 |