"Know what to answer the Epicurean". A diachronic study of the 'Apiqoros in rabbinic literature
This essay traces rabbinic usage and understanding of the term ʾapiqoros from tannaitic literature through the redactional layer of the Babylonian Talmud, showing that sources identified as tannaitic, amoraic, and editorial reflect a sequential, conceptual development in the term's usage. While...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Print Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
2003
|
In: |
Hebrew Union College annual / Jewish Institute of Religion
Year: 2003, Volume: 74, Pages: 175-214 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Greece (Antiquity)
/ Philosophy
|
IxTheo Classification: | BH Judaism TB Antiquity |
Further subjects: | B
Epicurus v341-v270
B Rabbinic literature B Talmud |
Summary: | This essay traces rabbinic usage and understanding of the term ʾapiqoros from tannaitic literature through the redactional layer of the Babylonian Talmud, showing that sources identified as tannaitic, amoraic, and editorial reflect a sequential, conceptual development in the term's usage. While the word ʾapiqoros is used colloquially today to refer to a Jewish heretic or dissenter, it meant something much more specific in tannaitic literature, and its meaning evolved and changed considerably after that period. While tannaim associated the ʾapiqoros with Greek philosophy, amoraim placed the term in the context of disrespect for Torah, and, still later, the editor of the Bavli conflated it with a phonetically similar Aramaic word for irreverence. The essay thus serves as a useful demonstration of how intellectual history can be traced using rabbinic sources. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0360-9049 |
Contains: | In: Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, Hebrew Union College annual / Jewish Institute of Religion
|