Incongruous Conciliation: A Constructive Critique of John Barclay's Paul and the Gift
John Barclay has recently argued that for Paul God’s grace, charis, in Christ is, almost without precedent, maximally ‘incongruous’, given to unfitting recipients. In fact, however, there are at least six further contemporary non-Christian examples, mostly Jewish, of incongruous grace in conciliatio...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
[2019]
|
| In: |
Journal for the study of the New Testament
Year: 2019, Volume: 41, Issue: 3, Pages: 384-402 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Pauline letters
/ Judaism
/ Greece (Antiquity)
/ Grace
/ Reconciliation
|
| IxTheo Classification: | BE Greco-Roman religions CD Christianity and Culture HB Old Testament HC New Testament HD Early Judaism NBK Soteriology |
| Further subjects: | B
καταλλαγή
B Barclay B Conciliation B incongruous B New Creation B Reconciliation |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | John Barclay has recently argued that for Paul God’s grace, charis, in Christ is, almost without precedent, maximally ‘incongruous’, given to unfitting recipients. In fact, however, there are at least six further contemporary non-Christian examples, mostly Jewish, of incongruous grace in conciliation, some using katallagē, ‘(re-)conciliation’, others not. Further, betokening change, from discord to harmony, katallagē never on its own conveys (in)congruent ‘restoration’ of anything. This, of course, affects our interpretation of Paul in Rom. 5.10-11, 11.15 and 2 Cor. 5.17-20 (where perhaps the ‘re-’ in ‘re-conciliation’ misleads). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5294 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the New Testament
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0142064X18821564 |