Three Aramaic Piyyutim for Purim: Text, Context, and Interpretation
This article presents a critical edition of three Aramaic piyyutim for Purim. The piyyutim are unique in that they were not written in Hebrew, the overwhelmingly dominant language of classical piyyutim, but in a biblicizing register of Aramaic. This puts these piyyutim in conversation with other for...
Autres titres: | Singing in the Vernacular: Jewish Palestinian Aramaic Poetry |
---|---|
Auteur principal: | |
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
[2019]
|
Dans: |
Aramaic studies
Année: 2019, Volume: 17, Numéro: 2, Pages: 198-255 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Liturgie
/ Judaïsme primitif
/ Judéo-araméen
/ Poétique
/ Pourim
/ Polémique
/ Christianisme
|
Classifications IxTheo: | HD Judaïsme ancien |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Jewish Palestinian Aramaic (JPA) poems
B anti-Christian polemic B Piyyut B Liturgical poetry B Purim |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | This article presents a critical edition of three Aramaic piyyutim for Purim. The piyyutim are unique in that they were not written in Hebrew, the overwhelmingly dominant language of classical piyyutim, but in a biblicizing register of Aramaic. This puts these piyyutim in conversation with other forms of Jewish Aramaic poetry, namely poems written in Jewish Palestinian Aramaic (JPA). The article includes a detailed analysis of the relation between the JPA poems for Purim and the piyyutim presented herein, and it argues that overt anti-Christian polemics are common to both. The Aramaic piyyutim presented here thus provide a unique nexus between JPA poetry and classical piyyut. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1745-5227 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Aramaic studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/17455227-01702006 |