How Far Is Love From Charity?: The Literary Influence of Reformation Bible Translation
This essay explores the literary and cultural influence of post-Reformation English Bible translation. The massive influence of biblical language and ideas has been well studied, but the specific influence of the translation process, much smaller but still detectable, remains unrecognized. The name...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
[2020]
|
| In: |
Reformation
Year: 2020, Volume: 25, Issue: 1, Pages: 69-91 |
| IxTheo Classification: | CD Christianity and Culture HA Bible KAG Church history 1500-1648; Reformation; humanism; Renaissance KBF British Isles |
| Further subjects: | B
Ben Jonson
B More B Love’s Labour’s Lost B Love and charity B The Three Lords and Three Ladies of London B Paradise Lost B Bible Translation B Tyndale B Hugh Broughton |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | This essay explores the literary and cultural influence of post-Reformation English Bible translation. The massive influence of biblical language and ideas has been well studied, but the specific influence of the translation process, much smaller but still detectable, remains unrecognized. The name of one Bible scholar, Hugh Broughton, became a byword for exceptional or even impossible erudition, perhaps due to prominent references in the plays of Ben Jonson. More pervasive was the legacy of Thomas More and William Tyndale’s arguments about the appropriate translation of the Greek ἀγάπη (agapē) as either “love” or “charity,” revived in the 1580s by William Fulke and Gregory Martin. Allusions and wordplay in plays by Shakespeare and Robert Wilson, prose works by Robert Greene and John Lyly, poems by Henry Constable and John Davies of Hereford, and finally in Milton’s Paradise Lost demonstrate that audiences and readers were familiar with the philological controversy beginning in the 1530s. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1752-0738 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Reformation
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13574175.2020.1743567 |