Theological Objections to a Metaphysicalist Interpretation of Creation
It has been argued that divine creation should be understood solely in a metaphysical and theological sense, and not within the context of modern cosmology and biology. In this way, any conflict between science and religion is totally avoided. William Carroll is a scholar of Aquinas who has justifie...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
[2020]
|
| Dans: |
Theology and science
Année: 2020, Volume: 18, Numéro: 2, Pages: 290-302 |
| Classifications IxTheo: | CF Christianisme et science HB Ancien Testament KAE Moyen Âge central NBC Dieu NBD Création VA Philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
theistic naturalism
B Origins B Creation B Aquinas B Metaphysics B Causality |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Résumé: | It has been argued that divine creation should be understood solely in a metaphysical and theological sense, and not within the context of modern cosmology and biology. In this way, any conflict between science and religion is totally avoided. William Carroll is a scholar of Aquinas who has justified this position, citing arguments made by Thomas, specifically that creation does not involve change. Here, I argue that this is a major distortion of Aquinas’ views and that the ontology of creation formulated is fundamentally incoherent. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1474-6719 |
| Référence: | Kritik in "Thomas Aquinas and William E. Carroll on Creatio ex Nihilo: A Response to Joseph Hannon’s “Theological Objections to a Metaphysicalist Interpretation of Creation” (2021)"
|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Theology and science
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2020.1755545 |