Theological Objections to a Metaphysicalist Interpretation of Creation
It has been argued that divine creation should be understood solely in a metaphysical and theological sense, and not within the context of modern cosmology and biology. In this way, any conflict between science and religion is totally avoided. William Carroll is a scholar of Aquinas who has justifie...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
[2020]
|
| In: |
Theology and science
Jahr: 2020, Band: 18, Heft: 2, Seiten: 290-302 |
| IxTheo Notationen: | CF Christentum und Wissenschaft HB Altes Testament KAE Kirchengeschichte 900-1300; Hochmittelalter NBC Gotteslehre NBD Schöpfungslehre VA Philosophie |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
theistic naturalism
B Origins B Creation B Aquinas B Metaphysics B Causality |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Zusammenfassung: | It has been argued that divine creation should be understood solely in a metaphysical and theological sense, and not within the context of modern cosmology and biology. In this way, any conflict between science and religion is totally avoided. William Carroll is a scholar of Aquinas who has justified this position, citing arguments made by Thomas, specifically that creation does not involve change. Here, I argue that this is a major distortion of Aquinas’ views and that the ontology of creation formulated is fundamentally incoherent. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1474-6719 |
| Bezug: | Kritik in "Thomas Aquinas and William E. Carroll on Creatio ex Nihilo: A Response to Joseph Hannon’s “Theological Objections to a Metaphysicalist Interpretation of Creation” (2021)"
|
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Theology and science
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2020.1755545 |