Tongue on Fire: Ethics of Speech in James

James 3:1-12 supplements routine exhortations to guard against the speech which follows from particular vices (1:19-20, anger; 1:26, false piety; 4:11, slander) with a wisdom speech on the tongue, which appears to make the project impossible. Limiting the reflection on out of control or destructive...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Subtitles:Research Article
Main Author: Perkins, Pheme 1945- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage Publ. [2020]
In: Interpretation
Year: 2020, Volume: 74, Issue: 4, Pages: 363-373
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B James / Style of speech / Admonition / Wisdom / Moral development
IxTheo Classification:HC New Testament
NCA Ethics
Further subjects:B Wisdom
B Moral Progress
B Speech
B Letter of James
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:James 3:1-12 supplements routine exhortations to guard against the speech which follows from particular vices (1:19-20, anger; 1:26, false piety; 4:11, slander) with a wisdom speech on the tongue, which appears to make the project impossible. Limiting the reflection on out of control or destructive speech to those seeking recognition as teachers (v. 1) introduces examples of destructive false teaching not present in James. The moralists’ distinction between those who require moral reprimand, those serious about making progress in virtue, and the “wise” as employed in Pauline exhortation resolves the tension between goal and difficulty noted in James. James 3:1-12 cautions “those in progress” against considering themselves “the perfect” (v. 2). Positive speech within the community, encouragement, mutual correction, healing, and prayer (5:7-20) do not require instruction by the wise.
ISSN:2159-340X
Contains:Enthalten in: Interpretation
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0020964320936404