Dynamic unity in the Gospel of John
The aim of this collection of essays, entitled “Dynamic Unity in the Gospel of John”, is to offer the reader another path through the tradition of interpretations. First, it explores some authors who are often neglected in studies of the history of this dogma: Clement of Alexandria (c. 150–c. 215),...
| Subtitles: | Special Issue: Dynamic Unity in the Gospel of John; Guest Editor: Julie Casteigt |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
De Gruyter
2020
|
| In: |
Journal of the bible and its reception
Year: 2020, Volume: 7, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-6 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
John
/ Clemens, Alexandrinus ca. 150-215
/ Origenes 185-254
/ Gregorius, Nazianzenus 329-390
/ Evagrius, Ponticus 345-399
/ Albertus, Magnus, Heiliger 1193-1280
/ Eckhart Meister 1260-1328
/ Exegesis
/ Patristics
/ Middle Ages
/ Philosophy
/ Hermeneutics
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity KAC Church history 500-1500; Middle Ages |
| Further subjects: | B
Gospel of John
B New-Testament studies B Patristics B Biblical Hermeneutics B Medieval Philosophy |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | The aim of this collection of essays, entitled “Dynamic Unity in the Gospel of John”, is to offer the reader another path through the tradition of interpretations. First, it explores some authors who are often neglected in studies of the history of this dogma: Clement of Alexandria (c. 150–c. 215), Origen of Alexandria (c. 184–c. 253), Gregory of Nazianzus (c. 329–390), Evagrius Ponticus (345–399), Albert the Great (c. 1200–1280), and Meister Eckhart (c. 1260–c. 1328). Second, it does not focus on the theological treatises, but rather on commentaries on the Gospel of John. It thereby aims to highlight the great variety of exegetical interpretations as found in biblical hermeneutics. Third, it adopts an interdisciplinary point of view by interweaving the methods proper to New-Testament studies, to patristics and to medieval philosophy. Fourth, it offers to the readers the possibility to adopt historical perspective on the exegetical tradition of these Johannine verses: both in their original context and in the history of their reception. The goal is to question the dynamics of the transfer of the idea of dynamic unity into different scholarly disciplines through various geographical, linguistic and cultural areas. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2329-4434 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of the bible and its reception
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1515/jbr-2020-0008 |