Cross-Purposes in the Gospel of Judas: What Judas Intended for Evil, God Intended for Good
The Gospel of Judas exhibits striking similarities with the Genesis story of Joseph. Projecting the logic of the latter onto the former creates a framework within which readers can reconcile the gospel’s negative evaluation of Judas with the apparent positive effects of Jesus’s death. Readers famili...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
2020
|
| Dans: |
Journal of early Christian studies
Année: 2020, Volume: 28, Numéro: 4, Pages: 481-500 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Evangelium des Judas
/ Bibel. Genesis 37
/ Jesus Christus
/ Judas, Iskariot, Apostel
/ Trahison
/ Rêve (Motif)
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | BF Gnosticisme HB Ancien Testament HD Judaïsme ancien |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | The Gospel of Judas exhibits striking similarities with the Genesis story of Joseph. Projecting the logic of the latter onto the former creates a framework within which readers can reconcile the gospel’s negative evaluation of Judas with the apparent positive effects of Jesus’s death. Readers familiar with the Joseph story possess categories for thinking through this dichotomy: Judah’s profit-motivated betrayal of Joseph was bad, but it resulted in the rescuing of many from famine. Accordingly, readers can hold in tension the idea that Judas’s profit-motivated betrayal of Jesus was bad even though it resulted in salvation for the incorruptible race. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1086-3184 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of early Christian studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1353/earl.2020.0048 |