Hilaire de Poitiers, Commentaire sur Matthieu 33, 5: plaidoyer pour le texte de la famille α
Three major reshuffles delineate two families (α and β) within the manuscript tradition of the Commentary on Matthew by Hilary of Poitiers. In the first two cases (3, 2; 9, 7-9), J. Doignon in his critical edition (SCh 254 and 258) favored the text of the α family, judging that the β family generall...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Französisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
[2020]
|
| In: |
Augustinianum
Jahr: 2020, Band: 60, Heft: 2, Seiten: 379-397 |
| IxTheo Notationen: | HC Neues Testament KAB Kirchengeschichte 30-500; Frühchristentum |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Zusammenfassung: | Three major reshuffles delineate two families (α and β) within the manuscript tradition of the Commentary on Matthew by Hilary of Poitiers. In the first two cases (3, 2; 9, 7-9), J. Doignon in his critical edition (SCh 254 and 258) favored the text of the α family, judging that the β family generally attests to numerous revisions intended to suppress difficult lectiones. In the third case, on the other hand, he adopted the short text of the β family, thus demoting two short passages in 33, 5 specific to the α family. This article shows that on the one hand the language of these passages is attributable to Hilary and on the other their content fits perfectly with his exegesis. It thus argues for their authenticity. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2162-6499 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Augustinianum
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/agstm202060221 |