Ritual or Military Action?: Interpreting Israel’s Muster at Mizpah in 1 Sam 7:2-17
This article evaluates the historicity of 1 Sam 7:2-17 in light of renewed analysis of the archaeological remains from Tell en-Nasbeh, other Iron Age I sites in the region of Benjamin, broader literary considerations in 1 Sam 1-10, and the geography of the Central Hill Country. In so doing, a case i...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
[2020]
|
In: |
Vetus Testamentum
Year: 2020, Volume: 70, Issue: 4/5, Pages: 620-633 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Bible. Samuel 1. 7,2-17
/ Bible. Samuel 1. 1-10
/ Misunderstanding
/ Israelis
/ Archaeology
|
IxTheo Classification: | HB Old Testament HH Archaeology |
Further subjects: | B
Mizpa
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | This article evaluates the historicity of 1 Sam 7:2-17 in light of renewed analysis of the archaeological remains from Tell en-Nasbeh, other Iron Age I sites in the region of Benjamin, broader literary considerations in 1 Sam 1-10, and the geography of the Central Hill Country. In so doing, a case is made that there is far more going on in vv. 6-7 than what appears to be a miscommunication between the Israelites, who have gathered at the site of Mizpah, and the Philistines, who send troops against the Israelites. A historical reconstruction that considers the narrative form of 1 Sam 7:2-17 and the archaeological remains is offered, as is a new proposal for the identification of the site of Gibeath-elohim. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1568-5330 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Vetus Testamentum
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685330-12341411 |