Katholische Exegese vor dem Zweiten Vatikanischen Konzil (1960-1961)
The so called »Roman Controversy« was a conflict between two schools of Biblical scholars in the 1950s and 1960s. While the Pontificium Institutum Biblicum took an interest in the historical-critical method, the Pontificia Universitas Lateranensis held that such a methodology was modernist and unnec...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | German |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Echter
2010
|
| In: |
Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie
Year: 2010, Volume: 132, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-24 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Pontificio Istituto Biblico
/ Pontificia Università Lateranense
/ Exegesis
/ Catholic Church
/ Controversy
/ History 1959-1964
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HA Bible KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history KDB Roman Catholic Church |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | The so called »Roman Controversy« was a conflict between two schools of Biblical scholars in the 1950s and 1960s. While the Pontificium Institutum Biblicum took an interest in the historical-critical method, the Pontificia Universitas Lateranensis held that such a methodology was modernist and unnecessary because of the infallibility of the bible. The controversy was at the heart of some of the discussions at Vatican II, and this study examines the particular issues and persons who participated in the conflict during the years leading up to the Council. |
|---|---|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie
|