Thomas Revisited: A Rejoinder to Denzey Lewis, Kloppenborg and Patterson

This article makes some observations on the Gospel of Thomas in connection with the responses to Goodacre’s Thomas and the Gospels and Gathercole’s Composition of the Gospel of Thomas. It notes that the order of Thomas’s sayings and the genre of Thomas are irrelevant to the question of dependence or...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gathercole, Simon J. 1974- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage 2014
In: Journal for the study of the New Testament
Year: 2014, Volume: 36, Issue: 3, Pages: 262-281
Further subjects:B Denzey Lewis
B Kloppenborg
B Gospel of Thomas
B Synoptics
B Patterson
B Gathercole
B Goodacre
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic
Description
Summary:This article makes some observations on the Gospel of Thomas in connection with the responses to Goodacre’s Thomas and the Gospels and Gathercole’s Composition of the Gospel of Thomas. It notes that the order of Thomas’s sayings and the genre of Thomas are irrelevant to the question of dependence or independence. More important to the question is the unity of Thomas, which is stronger than is often thought, though Thomas clearly is influenced by a number of (known and unknown) sources. The means of the influence of the Synoptic Gospels remains unknown. These arguments are strengthened by attention to aspects of Gos. Thom. 33 and Gos. Thom. 65–66. Overall, there are no obstacles to concluding that Thomas was influenced by the Synoptic Gospels.
ISSN:1745-5294
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the New Testament
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0142064X14520658