Looking at Scribal Practices in the Endings of Mark 16
Building upon a five years research SNSF grant on digital methodology and Mark 16, this article highlights scribal practices in New Testament textual criticism by focusing on the test-case of endings in Mark’s Gospel, pointing to a specific tradition of the so-called shorter ending in Latin Codex Bo...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Ed. Morcelliana
2020
|
| In: |
Henoch
Year: 2020, Volume: 42, Issue: 2, Pages: 373-387 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Bible. Markusevangelium 16
/ Textual criticism
/ Scribe
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament |
| Further subjects: | B
Textual Criticism
B history of reading B Mark Endings B Codex Bobbiensis B New Testament |
| Summary: | Building upon a five years research SNSF grant on digital methodology and Mark 16, this article highlights scribal practices in New Testament textual criticism by focusing on the test-case of endings in Mark’s Gospel, pointing to a specific tradition of the so-called shorter ending in Latin Codex Bobbiensis or G. vii.15. This tradition differs from the usual Greek shorter ending. Section 2 first argues that contemporaneous scribal practices still exist in Greek NT scholarship, whereas Section 3 presents nine cases of scribal practices in Mark 16 – seven Greek NT manuscripts (Gregory-Aland 083, 099, 019, 044, 1, 304 and 579, in chronological order), one Latin NT manuscript (codex k), and the Harklean Syriac version of Mark. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0393-6805 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Henoch
|