»Zufällige Geschichtswahrheiten«: Lessing und Semler im Streit
Hermann Samuel Reimarus' theories about the unscrupulousness of Jesus' disciples caused a heated argument between J. S. Semler and G. E. Lessing. As protagonists of the German Enlightenment, they advocated positions which actually were related in their structure. As a meticulous historian,...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | German |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Mohr Siebeck
2001
|
In: |
Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche
Year: 2001, Volume: 98, Issue: 4, Pages: 449-463 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
Summary: | Hermann Samuel Reimarus' theories about the unscrupulousness of Jesus' disciples caused a heated argument between J. S. Semler and G. E. Lessing. As protagonists of the German Enlightenment, they advocated positions which actually were related in their structure. As a meticulous historian, Semler opposed the ideologized discredit of the gospels. Lessing's experimental outlines are an attempt to discern the means of the rational recognition of the existence of God in history. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1868-7377 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche
|