Markion vs. Lukas: Plädoyer für die Wiederaufnahme eines alten Falles
For the last 150 years the Gospel of Marcion has been considered to be an abbreviated edition of the canonical Luke. This article renews the reverse hypothesis of Marcion's priority to Luke, Luke therefore being a revised and enlarged edition of Marcion. The arguments include a critique of the...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | German |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2006
|
| In: |
New Testament studies
Year: 2006, Volume: 52, Issue: 4, Pages: 484-513 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785738763 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221219190817.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||ger c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0028688506000270 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785738763 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785738763 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a ger | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1036144445 |0 (DE-627)749711922 |0 (DE-576)164979840 |4 aut |a Klinghardt, Matthias |d 1957- | |
| 109 | |a Klinghardt, Matthias 1957- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Markion vs. Lukas: Plädoyer für die Wiederaufnahme eines alten Falles |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2006 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a For the last 150 years the Gospel of Marcion has been considered to be an abbreviated edition of the canonical Luke. This article renews the reverse hypothesis of Marcion's priority to Luke, Luke therefore being a revised and enlarged edition of Marcion. The arguments include a critique of the traditional view, based primarily on its failure to verify Marcion's alleged editorial concept on the basis of his text, and to solve the problem what Marcion would have done with Acts. On the other hand, the beginning of Luke (esp. 1.1–4; 4.16–30) suggests that the differences between both editions are best understood as Lukan additions to Marcion rather than Marcionite abbreviations of Luke. This Lukan, anti-Marcionite revision is very close to the Four-Gospel-collection and first created the unity of Luke–Acts. | ||
| 601 | |a Wiederaufnahme | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t New Testament studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1954 |g 52(2006), 4, Seite 484-513 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)300895283 |w (DE-600)1483312-8 |w (DE-576)079165583 |x 1469-8145 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:52 |g year:2006 |g number:4 |g pages:484-513 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1645498808 |k Non-Electronic | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688506000270 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/new-testament-studies/article/markion-vs-lukas-pladoyer-fur-die-wiederaufnahme-eines-alten-falles/5AEB03E63A09382F9A3DB99192D3F58F |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo |a BIIN | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| BIB | |a 1 | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4033801308 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785738763 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112044348 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-01-05#DF301E48EA28A7D1D967B0BE7DC644C279FFBB20 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a BIB |a REL | ||