The Resurrection of Jesus in the Pre-Pauline Formula of 1 Cor 15.3–5
The present essay offers a fresh contribution to the long-standing debate regarding the nature of the resurrection of Christ within the pre-Pauline formula of 1 Cor 15.3–5. The article first provides an analysis of the current state of the discussion, offering new observations and lines of evidence...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Publicado: |
2014
|
En: |
New Testament studies
Año: 2014, Volumen: 60, Número: 4, Páginas: 475-498 |
Otras palabras clave: | B
Resurrection
B egeirō B Empty Tomb B 1 Cor 15 B pre-Pauline formula |
Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | No electrónico
|
Sumario: | The present essay offers a fresh contribution to the long-standing debate regarding the nature of the resurrection of Christ within the pre-Pauline formula of 1 Cor 15.3–5. The article first provides an analysis of the current state of the discussion, offering new observations and lines of evidence which suggest that a number of common arguments on both sides of the debate are lacking or inconclusive. The essay then offers a new proposal regarding the verb used within the formula for the resurrection event. The article presents previously neglected evidence significant for the debate regarding Jesus' resurrection within this primitive confession. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-8145 |
Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: New Testament studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0028688514000150 |