The Reconstruction of the "Mekhilta of Rabbi Shimon b. Yoḥai": A Reexamination

Over the past century, the Mekhilta of Rabbi Shimon b.Yoḥai has been subject to disproportionately little scholarly consideration compared with its tannaitic counterparts. This is due primarily to sustained scholarly concern about the reliability of the text, which was reconstructed first by D. Hoff...

全面介绍

Saved in:  
书目详细资料
主要作者: Nelson, David W. (Author)
格式: 电子 文件
语言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
出版: 2001
In: Hebrew Union College annual
Year: 1999, 卷: 70/71, Pages: 261-302
在线阅读: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 178645808X
003 DE-627
005 20220120091051.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220119s2001 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)178645808X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP178645808X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1023530554  |0 (DE-627)718400372  |0 (DE-576)366931709  |4 aut  |a Nelson, David W. 
109 |a Nelson, David W.  |a Nelson, W. David  |a Nelson, David William 
245 1 4 |a The Reconstruction of the "Mekhilta of Rabbi Shimon b. Yoḥai"  |b A Reexamination 
264 1 |c 2001 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Over the past century, the Mekhilta of Rabbi Shimon b.Yoḥai has been subject to disproportionately little scholarly consideration compared with its tannaitic counterparts. This is due primarily to sustained scholarly concern about the reliability of the text, which was reconstructed first by D. Hoffmann, and subsequently by J. N. Epstein and E.Z. Melamed, through highly complex processes from a large number of diverse sources. An analysis of these reconstructions reveals, however, that a common thread of editorial processes, guided by a common core of assumptions about early rabbinic textuality, binds together all the textual editions of the tannaitic midrashim. The question begs, therefore: why has the validity of the Mekhilta of Rabbi Shimon b. Yoḥai, in particular, come into question? The crux of the issue is the nature of the evidence available to Hoffmann and Epstein-Melamed for use in the construction of their editions of the text. A particular reason for skepticism is their reliance upon Midrash ha-Gadol as a source for textual material. However, a detailed examination and comparison of tractate Pisḥa in both editions of the Mekhilta of Rabbi Shimon b. Yoḥai reveals a high degree of correspondence between the various manuscript materials and Midrash ha-Gadol, and makes it possible to appraise more fully the overall reliability of the tractate in the Epstein-Melamed edition, and to a lesser extent, the reliability of the entire text. 
601 |a Reconstruction 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion  |t Hebrew Union College annual  |d Cincinnati, Ohio : HUC, 1924  |g 70/71(1999/2000), Seite 261-302  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)39060853X  |w (DE-600)2150715-6  |w (DE-576)314224513  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:70/71  |g year:1999/2000  |g pages:261-302 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/23508875  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a BIIN 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4038094456 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 178645808X 
LOK |0 005 20220119103444 
LOK |0 008 220119||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135-1  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135-1 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135-1 
LOK |0 852 1  |m p  |9 00 
LOK |0 852 2  |b FTH Z4-278 (Print)  |9 00 
LOK |0 85640  |u https://bibsearch.uibk.ac.at/AC02717547 
LOK |0 85640  |u https://bibsearch.uibk.ac.at/AC00965278 
LOK |0 935   |a inzs  |a inzo 
LOK |0 938   |k p 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB