Hosea’s Marriage Reconsidered
Whilst there is general agreement that Hosea 1-3 contains prophetic sign-acts, biographical information is sparse, and some argue that it is unwise to try to reconstruct details of Hosea’s marriage(s). This article argues from the premise that the historical context of sign-acts, insofar as it may b...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Tyndale House
2018
|
In: |
Tyndale bulletin
Year: 2018, Volume: 69, Issue: 1, Pages: 25-42 |
Further subjects: | B
hosea
B Prophets B Minor Prophets B Old Testament B gomer B prophetic sign-acts |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
Summary: | Whilst there is general agreement that Hosea 1-3 contains prophetic sign-acts, biographical information is sparse, and some argue that it is unwise to try to reconstruct details of Hosea’s marriage(s). This article argues from the premise that the historical context of sign-acts, insofar as it may be discerned, is significant for interpretation, and seeks to re-examine proposed historical scenarios and present a partial reconstruction. Issues include the interpretation of אֵשֶׁת זְנוּנִים (_’eshet zenunim_), translated ‘wife of whoredom’, in 1:2, and the identity of the unnamed woman in 3:1. The article concludes that _’eshet zenunim_ is best understood, proleptically, to relate to Gomer’s adultery after her marriage to Hosea, and that 3:1-5 points to the restoration of their earlier relationship. This view best fits the text and the parallel with Israel’s spiritual adultery, forgiveness, and restoration by her divine husband. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0082-7118 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Tyndale bulletin
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.53751/001c.27646 |