Response: The Blur of Letters, the Residue of Reception
This short piece offers a reflection, in light of the papers preceding it, on how we might engage some of the epistemological provocations associated with affect to reconceptualize letters and “reception” (the receiving of letters, the ongoing life of other kinds of texts). Drawing especially from M...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado: |
2022
|
| En: |
Biblical interpretation
Año: 2022, Volumen: 30, Número: 5, Páginas: 642-650 |
| (Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar: | B
Recepción
/ Sentimiento
/ Afectividad
|
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | HC Nuevo Testamento VB Hermenéutica ; Filosofía ZD Psicología |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Letters
B Reception B infrathin B Affect |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Sumario: | This short piece offers a reflection, in light of the papers preceding it, on how we might engage some of the epistemological provocations associated with affect to reconceptualize letters and “reception” (the receiving of letters, the ongoing life of other kinds of texts). Drawing especially from Michal Beth Dinkler’s notion of “epistolary embodiment,” and putting it in conversation with Fred Moten’s description of “blur” in Black sociality and Erin Manning’s (related) understanding of infrathin moments of perception, this piece proposes that semantic meaning is only one part of the way we make sense of letters, and texts at large. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1568-5152 |
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Biblical interpretation
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685152-03050006 |