Response: The Blur of Letters, the Residue of Reception
This short piece offers a reflection, in light of the papers preceding it, on how we might engage some of the epistemological provocations associated with affect to reconceptualize letters and “reception” (the receiving of letters, the ongoing life of other kinds of texts). Drawing especially from M...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
2022
|
| Dans: |
Biblical interpretation
Année: 2022, Volume: 30, Numéro: 5, Pages: 642-650 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Réception <scientifique>
/ Sentiment
/ Affectivité
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | HC Nouveau Testament VB Herméneutique; philosophie ZD Psychologie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Letters
B Reception B infrathin B Affect |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | This short piece offers a reflection, in light of the papers preceding it, on how we might engage some of the epistemological provocations associated with affect to reconceptualize letters and “reception” (the receiving of letters, the ongoing life of other kinds of texts). Drawing especially from Michal Beth Dinkler’s notion of “epistolary embodiment,” and putting it in conversation with Fred Moten’s description of “blur” in Black sociality and Erin Manning’s (related) understanding of infrathin moments of perception, this piece proposes that semantic meaning is only one part of the way we make sense of letters, and texts at large. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1568-5152 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Biblical interpretation
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685152-03050006 |