Is There Indeed a Coptic 2 Enoch?
In 2009, Joost Hagen made a remarkable discovery: he attributed four Coptic fragments from material excavated at Qasr Ibrim to 2 Enoch, since then most scholars no longer refer to this pseudepigraphon as “Slavonic Enoch”. Nevertheless, some works have appeared that question the authenticity of this...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2022
|
| In: |
Scrinium
Year: 2022, Volume: 18, Issue: 1, Pages: 440-451 |
| IxTheo Classification: | HD Early Judaism |
| Further subjects: | B
Slavonic Pseudepigrapha
B Coptic fragments of 2 Enoch B recensions B 2 Enoch |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | In 2009, Joost Hagen made a remarkable discovery: he attributed four Coptic fragments from material excavated at Qasr Ibrim to 2 Enoch, since then most scholars no longer refer to this pseudepigraphon as “Slavonic Enoch”. Nevertheless, some works have appeared that question the authenticity of this attribution, the article deals with the problem and provides arguments in favour of Hagen’s identification of the fragments. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1817-7565 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Scrinium
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/18177565-bja10072 |