Moses Stuart and the Unintentional Secularization of American Biblical Studies

Building off recent work investigating the development of modern biblical criticism, this essay argues that the broadly conservative scholar Moses Stuart (1780-1852) should be seen as playing a key but unintentional role in the secularization of biblical studies in nineteenth-century America. Stuart...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lundeen, Erik ca. 20./21. Jh. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2023
In: Harvard theological review
Year: 2023, Volume: 116, Issue: 3, Pages: 447-465
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Stuart, Moses 1780-1852 / Biblical studies / Hermeneutics / Secularization
IxTheo Classification:CF Christianity and Science
HA Bible
KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history
VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy
Further subjects:B common sense realism
B Christian Hebraism
B Hermeneutics
B Benjamin Jowett
B History of Biblical Interpretation
B Moses Stuart
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Building off recent work investigating the development of modern biblical criticism, this essay argues that the broadly conservative scholar Moses Stuart (1780-1852) should be seen as playing a key but unintentional role in the secularization of biblical studies in nineteenth-century America. Stuart played this role in several ways. Hermeneutically, he imbibed and popularized naturalistic assumptions summed up in the maxim that the Bible should be interpreted like any other book. Educationally, when arguing for the curricular importance of Hebrew studies, he justified the Bible’s importance not via its role as Scripture, but primarily via its place as excellent classical literature. Stuart’s example thereby suggests that, in studying the demise of Scripture’s sacred status in the modern era, scholars must pay attention not only to the attacks of the Bible’s liberal critics but also to the methods and assumptions of its conservative defenders.
ISSN:1475-4517
Contains:Enthalten in: Harvard theological review
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0017816023000238