Subjugating Subjectivity: Why Wright’s Critical Realism is Not Critical Enough

This analysis of N. T. Wright’s epistemological model – labelled critical realism – argues that Wright has lamentably failed the ambitious goal of mediating the two epistemic poles of external ‘objective’ reality and internal ‘subjective’ interpretation. The issues raised by scholars of the so-calle...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chidgzey, Aaron (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2023
In: Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
Year: 2023, Volume: 21, Issue: 3, Pages: 203-227
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Wright, N. T. 1948- / Jesus Christus / Resurrection / Methodology
IxTheo Classification:HB Old Testament
TA History
VA Philosophy
VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy
Further subjects:B Resurrection
B Epistemology
B Critical Realism
B Hermeneutics
B N. T. Wright
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:This analysis of N. T. Wright’s epistemological model – labelled critical realism – argues that Wright has lamentably failed the ambitious goal of mediating the two epistemic poles of external ‘objective’ reality and internal ‘subjective’ interpretation. The issues raised by scholars of the so-called ‘critical’ end of the dichotomy have subsequently failed to be considered to any significant degree and, instead, Wright ultimately reverts to an objectivist realism of the sort he decries. He privileges the assumptions on the ‘realism’ end and merely gestures toward the critical. This becomes especially clear in his study of Jesus’ resurrection, where his apologetic and historical discussions demonstrate a reliance upon an assumed objectivist and empiricist methodology.
ISSN:1745-5197
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/17455197-bja10022