Parapsychology, Hallucinations, Collective Delusions, and Jesus’ Post-Resurrection Appearances: A Response to Glenn Siniscalchi
After a brief outline of Glenn Siniscalchi’s apology for the traditional approach to the post-resurrection appearances, I examine his particular view that any attempt to compare the appearances of Jesus with the various apparitions discussed by parapsychologists is doomed to failure. Siniscalchi sta...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2023
|
In: |
Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
Year: 2023, Volume: 21, Issue: 3, Pages: 228-253 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Jesus Christus
/ Resurrection
/ Hallucination
/ Deception
|
IxTheo Classification: | CA Christianity HC New Testament NBA Dogmatics VA Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
Apparitions
B Siniscalchi B Hallucinations B post-resurrection appearances B collective delusions B Parapsychology |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | After a brief outline of Glenn Siniscalchi’s apology for the traditional approach to the post-resurrection appearances, I examine his particular view that any attempt to compare the appearances of Jesus with the various apparitions discussed by parapsychologists is doomed to failure. Siniscalchi states, correctly, that the only category of apparitions worthy of consideration at all is the ‘post-mortem apparition’. However, some of the suggested differences between these and the appearances of Jesus seem somewhat banal, and are not as significant as they are made out to be. My suggestion is that some form of hypothesis coupling hallucinations with collective delusions would explain both individual and collective post-resurrection appearances, and serve as a viable alternative to the traditional evangelical view. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1745-5197 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/17455197-bja10024 |