Reflections on Peter Nagel's article : "Problematising the Divinity of Jesus: Why Jesus is not Theos" - including a short history of the doctrine of the Trinity
This is a response to an article written by South African New Testament scholar, Peter Nagel. The article draws on the thoughts of another South African New Testament scholar Andries van Aarde and of German theologian Bernhard Lohse, on the history of the doctrine of the Trinity. Concluding observat...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Stellenbosch University
2024
|
| In: |
Stellenbosch theological journal
Year: 2024, Volume: 10, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-23 |
| IxTheo Classification: | FA Theology HC New Testament NBF Christology |
| Further subjects: | B
Augustine
B Doctrine B Iesous B Trinity B Irenaeus B Nicaea B Theos B Origen B Divinity B Van Aarde B Nails and spikes B Athanasius B Lohse |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | This is a response to an article written by South African New Testament scholar, Peter Nagel. The article draws on the thoughts of another South African New Testament scholar Andries van Aarde and of German theologian Bernhard Lohse, on the history of the doctrine of the Trinity. Concluding observations include inquiring as to how the church will effectively address this type of study in its deliberations and decisions. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2413-9467 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "Problematising the Divinity of Jesus (2019)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Stellenbosch theological journal
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.17570/stj.2024.v10n1.1 |