Plato or Moses?: The Use of the Antiquity Argument in Hellenistic Jewish Writings

In antiquity, apologetic defences often included appeals to an ancient past. Fundamental to the ancient mind was a notion that favoured primitive wisdom over contemporary culture, antiquity over novel discoveries. In the ongoing clashes between cultures and ethnicities which signified the Hellenisti...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Nyström, David E. 1975- (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado: 2024
En: Scandinavian journal of the Old Testament
Año: 2024, Volumen: 38, Número: 2, Páginas: 278–307
(Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar:B Judaísmo / Helenismo / Antigüedad / Apologética
Clasificaciones IxTheo:HB Antiguo Testamento
Otras palabras clave:B Hellenism
B Antiquity
B Early Judaism
B Apologetics
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descripción
Sumario:In antiquity, apologetic defences often included appeals to an ancient past. Fundamental to the ancient mind was a notion that favoured primitive wisdom over contemporary culture, antiquity over novel discoveries. In the ongoing clashes between cultures and ethnicities which signified the Hellenistic era, this notion was often combined with a competitive search for communal recognition and validity. This article offers a survey of Jewish authors in Hellenistic times, who engaged in this battle for old age. The article shows how various Jewish writers employed the antiquity argument through comparative historiography, in which they traced the roots of civilization to ancient heroes of Israel. The article ends with a discussion on the logic, structure, and purpose of the antiquity argument.
ISSN:1502-7244
Obras secundarias:Enthalten in: Scandinavian journal of the Old Testament
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/09018328.2023.2276461