Was Deuteronomy among the Economists?
In a recent article published in JSOT, S.L. Richter suggested that Urdeuteronomium can be dated by the economic features in the text. She restored, supposedly by archaeological means, three “economies” of “ancient Israel” that fit three chronological phases of the Iron Age; and concluded that “the e...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado: |
2024
|
| En: |
Scandinavian journal of the Old Testament
Año: 2024, Volumen: 38, Número: 2, Páginas: 308–327 |
| (Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar: | B
Bibel. Deuteronomium
/ Israel (Antigüedad)
/ Economía
/ Dinero
|
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | HB Antiguo Testamento |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
hacksilber
B Money B Economy B Deuteronomy B Israel |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Sumario: | In a recent article published in JSOT, S.L. Richter suggested that Urdeuteronomium can be dated by the economic features in the text. She restored, supposedly by archaeological means, three “economies” of “ancient Israel” that fit three chronological phases of the Iron Age; and concluded that “the economy assumed in Urdeuteronomium is best suited to the late Iron I/Iron IIA era and/or to a rural and isolated sector of the Iron IIB era” (Richter 2017: 50). Berge et al. (2019) have criticized some issues with this article. In this paper I discuss other aspects, mainly archaeological and economic, which show that Richter’s conclusion is not valid. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1502-7244 |
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Scandinavian journal of the Old Testament
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/09018328.2024.2335217 |