Beyond a Slave: Support for the Manumission of Onesimus from Discourse Analysis

Did Paul intend for Philemon to manumit Onesimus? This article aims to present evidence in support of a manumissive view of Paul’s communicative intent to Philemon. Through a cognitive functional approach to discourse analysis, the sentence comprising vv. 15–16 is proposed to represent the peak of t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Arinder, Devin (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado: 2024
En: Journal for the study of the New Testament
Año: 2024, Volumen: 47, Número: 2, Páginas: 322-347
(Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar:B Bibel. Philemonbrief / Bibel. Philemonbrief 15 / Bibel. Philemonbrief 16-17 / Paulus, Apostel, Heiliger / Philemon, Personaje bíblico / Onesimus, Heiliger, Biblische Person
Clasificaciones IxTheo:HC Nuevo Testamento
NCE Ética económica
Otras palabras clave:B Discourse Analysis
B koine Greek
B Cognitive Linguistics
B Philemon
B Pauline Studies
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descripción
Sumario:Did Paul intend for Philemon to manumit Onesimus? This article aims to present evidence in support of a manumissive view of Paul’s communicative intent to Philemon. Through a cognitive functional approach to discourse analysis, the sentence comprising vv. 15–16 is proposed to represent the peak of the epistle. Coincidingly, this central statement of the letter is precisely where Paul discusses the enslavement of Onesimus. There, through his linguistic choices, Paul construes emphatic discontinuity in Onesimus’s status, resulting in the most salient change in Philemon’s mental representation: Onesimus is no longer a slave, but beyond a slave, a beloved brother.
ISSN:1745-5294
Obras secundarias:Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the New Testament
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0142064X241268659