Toward a Theology of Tension

Dru Johnson’s account of Hebraic philosophy seems well-suited for the task of reconciling the Christian account of God with the reality of suffering. I outline two ways in which this is the case: one retrospective, one proactive. Looking back, if biblical philosophy is mysterionist, creationist, tra...

全面介绍

Saved in:  
书目详细资料
主要作者: Morris, Dolores G. (Author)
其他作者: Johnson, Dru 1974- (Bibliographic antecedent)
格式: 电子 Review
语言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
出版: 2024
In: Philosophia Christi
Year: 2024, 卷: 26, 发布: 2, Pages: 247-265
Review of:Biblical philosophy (Cambridge, United Kingdom : Cambridge University Press, 2021) (Morris, Dolores G.)
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
HB Old Testament
NBC Doctrine of God
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B 书评
在线阅读: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
实物特征
总结:Dru Johnson’s account of Hebraic philosophy seems well-suited for the task of reconciling the Christian account of God with the reality of suffering. I outline two ways in which this is the case: one retrospective, one proactive. Looking back, if biblical philosophy is mysterionist, creationist, transdemographic, and ritualist, then we might understand the failure of a certain kind of theodicy in light of its failure to meet one or more of these criteria. Looking forward, we ought to keep these features in mind. I conclude by suggesting that Johnson’s account of truth is, in fact, best understood as a correspondence account.
ISSN:2640-2580
Reference:Kommentar in "A Brief Response to Meek, Morris, and Mullins (2024)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Philosophia Christi
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.5840/pc202426220