“Apocryphal Acts of the Apostles”: A Problematic Designation

In this article, the author argues that the history of research on the apocryphal acts of the apostles is still largely influenced by the biblical canon and by the habits of reading and interpretation that are a natural consequence of it. He first shows that the modern habit of designating a varied...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gounelle, Rémi 1967- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2025
In: Novum Testamentum
Year: 2025, Volume: 67, Issue: 3, Pages: 375-401
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Acts of the Apostles / Apokryphe Testamente / Canon / Byzantine Empire
IxTheo Classification:HA Bible
HC New Testament
KAA Church history
KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity
KAC Church history 500-1500; Middle Ages
Further subjects:B canonicity
B Apocrypha
B Acts of the Apostles
B apocryphal acts of the Apostles
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:In this article, the author argues that the history of research on the apocryphal acts of the apostles is still largely influenced by the biblical canon and by the habits of reading and interpretation that are a natural consequence of it. He first shows that the modern habit of designating a varied body of late ancient literature as “apocryphal acts,” opposed to canonical Acts, has obscured the many differences among these texts and overlooked their medieval designations. He then discusses how works categorized as “apocryphal acts” have been closely compared to Acts in biblical research, and shows that it does not correspond to the way these texts were perceived in antiquity and in Byzantium. Last, the author reviews the data showing that the canonical and apocryphal books were not rivals and that the books categorized as “apocryphal acts” were not understood in this way in Church tradition.
ISSN:1568-5365
Contains:Enthalten in: Novum Testamentum
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15685365-bja10102