“Apocryphal Acts of the Apostles”: A Problematic Designation

In this article, the author argues that the history of research on the apocryphal acts of the apostles is still largely influenced by the biblical canon and by the habits of reading and interpretation that are a natural consequence of it. He first shows that the modern habit of designating a varied...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gounelle, Rémi 1967- (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publicado: 2025
En: Novum Testamentum
Año: 2025, Volumen: 67, Número: 3, Páginas: 375-401
(Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar:B Bibel. Apostelgeschichte / Apokryphe Testamente / Canon / Byzantinisches Reich
Clasificaciones IxTheo:HA Biblia
HC Nuevo Testamento
KAA Iglesia ; Historia
KAB Cristianismo primitivo
KAC Edad Media
Otras palabras clave:B canonicity
B Apocrypha
B Acts of the Apostles
B apocryphal acts of the Apostles
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descripción
Sumario:In this article, the author argues that the history of research on the apocryphal acts of the apostles is still largely influenced by the biblical canon and by the habits of reading and interpretation that are a natural consequence of it. He first shows that the modern habit of designating a varied body of late ancient literature as “apocryphal acts,” opposed to canonical Acts, has obscured the many differences among these texts and overlooked their medieval designations. He then discusses how works categorized as “apocryphal acts” have been closely compared to Acts in biblical research, and shows that it does not correspond to the way these texts were perceived in antiquity and in Byzantium. Last, the author reviews the data showing that the canonical and apocryphal books were not rivals and that the books categorized as “apocryphal acts” were not understood in this way in Church tradition.
ISSN:1568-5365
Obras secundarias:Enthalten in: Novum Testamentum
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15685365-bja10102