Heterodoxia trinitaria: modalismo y subordinacionismo 17 siglos después

This paper studies the ontological structure of modalism and subordinatio­nism as the main Trinitarian heresies in history. Modalism is described as the paradigmatic temptation of the West and subordinationism as the typically Eastern deviation. It is analyzed how modalism owes a debt to rationalism...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Marín Mena, Tomás J. (Auteur)
Type de support: Imprimé Article
Langue:Espagnol
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: 2025
Dans: Gregorianum
Année: 2025, Volume: 106, Numéro: 2, Pages: 203-229
Classifications IxTheo:NBC Dieu
VB Herméneutique; philosophie
Sujets non-standardisés:B Rationalism
B Heresies
B Arianism
B Trinity
B apophatic mysticism
Description
Résumé:This paper studies the ontological structure of modalism and subordinatio­nism as the main Trinitarian heresies in history. Modalism is described as the paradigmatic temptation of the West and subordinationism as the typically Eastern deviation. It is analyzed how modalism owes a debt to rationalism and subordinationism to apophatic mysticism. In addition, the theological reflections on the Trinity by R. Haight and R. Panikkar are approached as contemporary updates of these two tendencies. We consider that the primary flaw of both theological tendencies is to prioritize the Divine One, whether as Consciousness or abstract Silence, without attending to the importance of intra-Trinitarian Otherness.
ISSN:0017-4114
Contient:Enthalten in: Gregorianum