The History of Codex Alexandrinus: New Evidence from Arabic Paratexts

This article re-examines Codex Alexandrinus’s history, providing new paratextual evidence that supports an Alexandrian provenance, maintained in Egypt until its 17th-century transfer to England via Constantinople. It challenges scholarship favouring Constantinople as the codex’s home until the 14th...

全面介绍

Saved in:  
书目详细资料
主要作者: Monier, Mina (Author)
格式: 电子 文件
语言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
出版: 2025
In: Novum Testamentum
Year: 2025, 卷: 67, 发布: 4, Pages: 501-526
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Codex Alexandrinus / Alexandria / Konstantinopel / Kopten / Melchiten / 卡农 / 文本批判 / Arabisch
IxTheo Classification:HA Bible
KAA Church history
KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity
KAD Church history 500-900; early Middle Ages
KAE Church history 900-1300; high Middle Ages
KBL Near East and North Africa
Further subjects:B patriarchate of Alexandria
B Provenance
B New Testament Canon
B Manuscript
B Paratexts
B Codex Alexandrinus
B Melkite
B Coptic
在线阅读: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
实物特征
总结:This article re-examines Codex Alexandrinus’s history, providing new paratextual evidence that supports an Alexandrian provenance, maintained in Egypt until its 17th-century transfer to England via Constantinople. It challenges scholarship favouring Constantinople as the codex’s home until the 14th century. Analyses of endowment (waqf) statements reveal differences between Patriarch Athanasius’s waqf and codices from Constantinople. Moreover, Arabic paratexts preceding Athanasius’s waqf point to Arab-speaking Melkites in Egypt and earlier Coptic ownership. These findings, alongside distinctive features in Codex Alexandrinus’s New Testament canon paralleling Egyptian Coptic and hitherto unstudied Melkite canons, bolster a plausible Coptic acquisition and later Melkite ownership within Egyptian transmission history. The study thus presents a nuanced framework, inviting further scrutiny of the codex’s text in Greek, Coptic, and Arabic contexts. By illuminating the codex’s roots, this analysis proposes new directions for examining its attested text types.
ISSN:1568-5365
Contains:Enthalten in: Novum Testamentum
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15685365-bja10103