‘QUO VADIS’ CHURCH HISTORY / ECCLESIOLOGY? A RESPONSE
It is a privilege to have the opportunity to think about the future of theology as an academic discipline and especially on the role of Ecclesiology (Church History). I will do it by just briefly making some comments on all five theses as were set on the table by Dr Vosloo. The comments are not exte...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2009
|
| In: |
Scriptura
Year: 2009, Volume: 100, Pages: 65-66 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | It is a privilege to have the opportunity to think about the future of theology as an academic discipline and especially on the role of Ecclesiology (Church History). I will do it by just briefly making some comments on all five theses as were set on the table by Dr Vosloo. The comments are not extensive but rather reflects my own personal and passionate beliefs, and I will jump from the perspective of students, church leaders and my own position as lover of history. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2305-445X |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Scriptura
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.7833/100-0-654 |