Reading Gesture in John 20.16–17 and Its Afterlives
In research literature and works of art, the textual gap of Mary’s bodily action, implicit in Jesus’ phrase μή μου ἅπτου (John 20.17b), is frequently filled either with a proskynesis or a standing embrace. Against the background of Judith Butler’s theory of gesture, this article analyses attempts at...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2025
|
| In: |
New Testament studies
Year: 2025, Volume: 71, Issue: 2, Pages: 171-185 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Bible. Johannesevangelium 20,16-17
/ Mary Magdalen
/ Jesus Christus
/ Gesture
/ Gestures
/ Performativity (Cultural sciences)
/ Butler, Judith 1956-
/ Noli me tangere
/ Art
/ Reception
/ Proskynese
/ Anagnorisis
|
| IxTheo Classification: | CE Christian art HC New Testament |
| Further subjects: | B
John 20
B anagnorisis scenes B Judith Butler B Gesture B Performativity B proskynesis B Reception B Noli me tangere B Mary Magdalene |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | In research literature and works of art, the textual gap of Mary’s bodily action, implicit in Jesus’ phrase μή μου ἅπτου (John 20.17b), is frequently filled either with a proskynesis or a standing embrace. Against the background of Judith Butler’s theory of gesture, this article analyses attempts at filling in the gaps in the text. The notion of gesture as bodily quotation helps to interpret Mary and Jesus not as counterparts, but as a performative unit enacting continuity and difference after Jesus’ death. The reading offered in this article focuses on the interaction between bodies, and it undermines the dichotomy between speech and body, man and woman, heaven and earth. This article examines exegetical interpretations of Mary’s gesture, alongside artistic interpretations, to show that the way the textual gap is filled is significant because gestures are significant. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-8145 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: New Testament studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0028688524000511 |