Caves of Dispute: Patterns of Correspondence and Suspicion in the Post-2002 “Dead Sea Scrolls” Fragments
Over 30 fragments purportedly from the Dead Sea Scrolls belonging to two private collections were published for the first time in Summer 2016. Virtually all of these fragments in The Schøyen Collection and Museum of the Bible are non-provenanced apart from verbal guarantees made by their sellers. An...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2017
|
In: |
Dead Sea discoveries
Year: 2017, Volume: 24, Issue: 2, Pages: 229-270 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Dead Sea scrolls, Qumran Scrolls
/ Fragment
/ Origin
/ Authenticity
/ Forgery
|
IxTheo Classification: | HD Early Judaism HH Archaeology |
Further subjects: | B
Dead Sea Scrolls
provenance
archaeology
Judaean Desert manuscript discoveries
textual criticism
scribal practices
palaeography
manuscript forgery
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Over 30 fragments purportedly from the Dead Sea Scrolls belonging to two private collections were published for the first time in Summer 2016. Virtually all of these fragments in The Schøyen Collection and Museum of the Bible are non-provenanced apart from verbal guarantees made by their sellers. An unusual feature of these fragments is that almost all of them correspond to texts from the Hebrew Bible, but also to a few previously known compositions from antiquity. This paper examines the published fragments from both collections according to their observable physical properties, as well as palaeographical and scribal characteristics, and seeks to understand from these more about their potential origin—whether from antiquity or modern times. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1568-5179 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Dead Sea discoveries
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685179-12341441 |