Suffering and covenantal hope in Galatians: a critique of the apocalyptic reading' and its proponents
This article addresses the so-called apocalyptic reading of Paul', taking the representative work of J. Louis Martyn and Martinus C. de Boer as its primary focus. The chief contention is that the apocalyptic reading' does not resemble the historical phenomenon of Jewish apocalyptic liter...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2015]
|
| In: |
Scottish journal of theology
Year: 2015, Volume: 68, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-15 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Martyn, J. Louis 1925-2015
/ Boer, Martinus C. de 1947-
/ Galatians
/ Apocalypticism
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament NBQ Eschatology |
| Further subjects: | B
Apocalyptic
B Martinus C. de Boer B Galatians B Covenant B J. Louis Martyn B Persecution B Suffering B Paul |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | This article addresses the so-called apocalyptic reading of Paul', taking the representative work of J. Louis Martyn and Martinus C. de Boer as its primary focus. The chief contention is that the apocalyptic reading' does not resemble the historical phenomenon of Jewish apocalyptic literature, although the scope of this article has been intentionally limited to Galatians. The present study is composed of two halves. The first half offers a critique of what it means for Paul to be an apocalyptic thinker according to Martyn and de Boer. Their emphasis is on discontinuity, duality and dichotomy, which coheres neither with first-century apocalyptic literature and its antecedents, nor with the letter to the Galatians. Their nuanced notion of apocalyptic has led to an unnecessary bifurcation between apocalyptic and covenant (not to mention Heilsgeschichte) in the interpretation of Paul. However, this article suggests that the dichotomy has been misplaced, both in relation to the discontinuity that Paul does articulate (i.e. with the law), and the dichotomy reflected in apocalyptic literature, namely, the division between the present evil age and the glorious age to come. Thus, it is argued that Martyn and de Boer's focus on discontinuity hardly constitutes apocalyptic in a first-century historical sense. Rather, their specific emphasis owes its articulation to the theology of Karl Barth. After arguing that the apocalyptic reading' lacks historical precision (and possibly theological forthrightness), the second half of the study argues that some neglected features of Galatians, such as suffering and persecution, cohere with the apocalyptic character of the letter, and are common features of apocalyptic broadly. In fact, the division between apocalyptic and covenant in scholarship on Galatians is bridged by the themes of conflict and crisis. This is because apocalyptic hope often arises in the absence of the realisation of covenantal promises and expectations; a covenantal disconnect is created and aggravated by crises and hardships of various sorts, hence the need for apocalyptic hope. Suffering therefore ties together the strands of apocalyptic and covenant in Galatians. If Martyn and de Boer's apocalyptic reading' was truly apocalyptic in a first-century historical sense, it would have integrated the imagery of suffering and persecution found in the letter. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1475-3065 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0036930614000866 |