The Recovery of Paul's Female Colleagues in Nineteenth-Century Feminist Biblical Interpretation

In the nineteenth century, women did not gain admission to universities to study biblical languages and the new “higher criticism.” This does not mean, however, that women did not undertake critical, scholarly interpretation of the Bible. This essay examines how two late nineteenth-century American...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Marshall, Jill E. 1981- (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Print Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publicado: [2017]
En: Journal of feminist studies in religion
Año: 2017, Volumen: 33, Número: 2, Páginas: 21-36
(Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar:B Stanton, Elizabeth Cady 1815-1902, Woman's Bible / Stowe, Harriet Beecher 1811-1896 / Dietrick, Ellen Battelle 1847-1895 / Exegesis / Bibel
Clasificaciones IxTheo:FD Teología contextual
HA Biblia
KBQ América del Norte
Parallel Edition:Electrónico
Descripción
Sumario:In the nineteenth century, women did not gain admission to universities to study biblical languages and the new “higher criticism.” This does not mean, however, that women did not undertake critical, scholarly interpretation of the Bible. This essay examines how two late nineteenth-century American authors—Harriett Beecher Stowe and Ellen Battelle Dietrick—challenged church- and academy-based interpretation of Paul's female colleagues, Lydia, Prisca, and Phoebe. Through their own ideological lenses influenced by the church, American culture, and women's rights movements, they each engaged academic arguments and critiqued the gendered biases that shaped how male scholars and clerics interpreted primary sources and created arguments about biblical women.
ISSN:8755-4178
Obras secundarias:Enthalten in: Journal of feminist studies in religion