Designation is significant: an analysis of the conceptual Sugya in bSan 47b48b
Explicit rabbinic legal concepts and principles—notions such as “multiple causation is prohibited/permitted” (zeh ve-zeh gorem muttar/ءasur), “retrospective determination of reality is/is not valid” (yesh/ءein bererah), and the like—occur frequently in the Babylonian Talmud (BT), especially in the l...
| Subtitles: | Research Article |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
[2003]
|
| In: |
AJS review
Year: 2003, Volume: 27, Issue: 2, Pages: 227-252 |
| Further subjects: | B
Legal Status
B Leather industry B Appurtenances B Idol worship B Tefillin B Legal objections B Idolatry B Talmud B Jewish rituals |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | Explicit rabbinic legal concepts and principles—notions such as “multiple causation is prohibited/permitted” (zeh ve-zeh gorem muttar/ءasur), “retrospective determination of reality is/is not valid” (yesh/ءein bererah), and the like—occur frequently in the Babylonian Talmud (BT), especially in the later strata of that work.See generally Leib Moscovitz, Talmudic Reasoning: From Casuistics to Conceptualization (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2002), especially pp. 292–342, with extensive references to earlier literature. Most concepts and principles of this sort are applied to a case or two, although we sometimes find extended conceptual sugyot in BT that systematically analyze a particular legal principle. Such passages generally analyze a group of tannaitic sources in light of the specified principle, which is assumed to apply to all the cases cited; these cases may be adduced either to support or to refute the relevant principle. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1475-4541 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Association for Jewish Studies, AJS review
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0364009403000084 |