Nahum and the greek tradition on Nineveh's fall
Greek tradition does not provide consistent and reliable evidence that an unusual inundation contributed to the fall of Nineveh. The Babylonian chronicles do not mention such an extraordinary event nor have archaeological excavations at Nineveh produced any evidence in support of such notion. Nineve...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
The National Library of Canada
2006
|
| In: |
The journal of Hebrew scriptures
Year: 2006, Volume: 6, Pages: 2-16 |
| IxTheo Classification: | BC Ancient Orient; religion HB Old Testament HH Archaeology |
| Further subjects: | B
Ninive
B Nahum B Diodorus Siculus B Xenophon (430 BC-354 BC) |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | Greek tradition does not provide consistent and reliable evidence that an unusual inundation contributed to the fall of Nineveh. The Babylonian chronicles do not mention such an extraordinary event nor have archaeological excavations at Nineveh produced any evidence in support of such notion. Nineveh's topography precludes the possibility of significant flooding by the Khosr canal. The various verses in Nahum that have been construed as supporting flooding in Nineveh find a reasonable figurative interpretation within a contextual scheme that does not involve flooding. The notion that Nineveh was captured through flooding should be discarded. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1203-1542 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: The journal of Hebrew scriptures
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5508/jhs.2006.v6.a8 |