Response to Azzan Yadin-Israel on rabbinic polysemy: do they "preach" what they practice?
The author revisits texts and arguments from his 2007 article in AJS Review 31 no. 1 in response to a “response” by Azzan Yadin-Israel in the April 2014 issue (38, no. 1). The central question is whether the widespread rabbinic textual practices of interpretive polysemy and legal multivocality are t...
| Subtitles: | Research Article |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
[2014]
|
| In: |
AJS review
Year: 2014, Volume: 38, Issue: 2, Pages: 339-361 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Yadin-Israel, Azzan
/ Rabbinic literature
/ Polysemy
/ Pluralism
B Rabbi / Journalistic editing / Divinity / Talmûd bavlî |
| IxTheo Classification: | BH Judaism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | The author revisits texts and arguments from his 2007 article in AJS Review 31 no. 1 in response to a “response” by Azzan Yadin-Israel in the April 2014 issue (38, no. 1). The central question is whether the widespread rabbinic textual practices of interpretive polysemy and legal multivocality are the product of the post-amoraic (“stammaitic”) editorial layer of the Babylonian Talmud (Yadin-Israel) or are already evidenced and theologically thematized in the earlier “tannaitic” rabbinic collections from the Land of Israel (Fraade). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1475-4541 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Association for Jewish Studies, AJS review
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0364009414000294 |