The Chronicler's "Vorlage", Kalimi verses Auld
Graeme Auld's argument of the "Two Houses" sharing the same vorlage is rejected by Isaac Kalimi. Kalimi insists that the Chronicler used the proto-Masoretic book of Kings as his source. However, there are a number of problems not addressed by Kalimi including chronological patterns an...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis
[2019]
|
In: |
Scandinavian journal of the Old Testament
Year: 2019, Volume: 33, Issue: 1, Pages: 95-110 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Hezekiah Judah, King
/ Jeroboam II Israel, King 787 BC-747 BC
/ Jotham Judah, King
/ Rehabeam, Juda, König
/ Exegesis
/ Chronology
/ Dead Sea scrolls, Qumran Scrolls
/ Bible. Könige 1.
/ Bible. Könige 2.
/ Bible. Chronicle 1.
/ Bible. Chronicle 2.
|
IxTheo Classification: | HB Old Testament |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Graeme Auld's argument of the "Two Houses" sharing the same vorlage is rejected by Isaac Kalimi. Kalimi insists that the Chronicler used the proto-Masoretic book of Kings as his source. However, there are a number of problems not addressed by Kalimi including chronological patterns and conflicting synchronisms. There is every reason to believe that the redacted proto-Masoretic book of Kings and the book of Chronicles shared the same vorlage as Auld has argued. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1502-7244 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Scandinavian journal of the Old Testament
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/09018328.2019.1600258 |