The date of building 338 at Megiddo: a rejoinder
Recently Kleiman, Kaplan and Finkelstein (2016) presented the results of their excavation in the area of Building 338 in Megiddo, arguing that the data acquired in the new excavation proves that Building 338 should be dated to Stratum IVA. In the present rejoinder I continue to argue for its dating...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Soc.
2017
|
| In: |
Israel exploration journal
Year: 2017, Volume: 67, Issue: 1, Pages: 50-60 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Megiddo
/ Palestine
/ Archaeology
/ Pre- and early history
/ Israel
|
| IxTheo Classification: | BC Ancient Orient; religion HH Archaeology |
| Summary: | Recently Kleiman, Kaplan and Finkelstein (2016) presented the results of their excavation in the area of Building 338 in Megiddo, arguing that the data acquired in the new excavation proves that Building 338 should be dated to Stratum IVA. In the present rejoinder I continue to argue for its dating to Stratum VA–IVB, on the basis of all available data. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0021-2059 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Israel exploration journal
|