The ending of the pre-Markan passion narrative
This article argues that the pre-Markan passion narrative ended with a starkly unadorned account of the empty tomb, an account which raises as many questions about Jesus's fate as it does answers. Employing tradition and redaction criticism, I reveal that the pre-Markan empty tomb account conta...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
[2018]
|
In: |
Scriptura
Year: 2018, Volume: 117, Pages: 1-11 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Grave
/ Tradition
/ Criticism
/ Mark
/ Passion
|
IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament HH Archaeology |
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Summary: | This article argues that the pre-Markan passion narrative ended with a starkly unadorned account of the empty tomb, an account which raises as many questions about Jesus's fate as it does answers. Employing tradition and redaction criticism, I reveal that the pre-Markan empty tomb account contained no mention of an angel, Jesus's resurrection, or Galilean appearances. Rather, it straightforwardly de-scribed the women's coming to the tomb, finding the tomb empty, and fleeing from the tomb in terror and silence. The logic of the pre-Markan ending discloses that the women fled because they naturally assumed grave robbery and feared being implicated in this capital crime. Throughout this article, I interact with the views of Sakkie Spangenberg, Hansie Wolmarans, Andries van Aarde and Julian Müller, four prominent South African scholars who have commented on the empty tomb narrative. |
---|---|
Physical Description: | 11 |
ISSN: | 2305-445X |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Scriptura
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.7833/117-1-1352 |